Creating an Environment: Pt.5 Playtesting

playtest1

Originally, this stairway was mirrored to the right with the railing justified to the center. Players told me they actually wanted less routes to each key-point in the map to make significant pathing choices more often. Additionally, the proportions were causing players to get physically caught on objects. By refitting each side of the structure to  one stairway, it presented a design that also limited the means to reach the central Capture Point, which can decide a match.

No practice in creating game environments has proven as informative  to me in design-work as play testing. Even if it’s an author’s first map ever, one that has never actually been tested, there’s a good chance the ideas going into it are based off past experiences in a particular game. What kind of level have players generally disapproved of, and what kind of flow of navigation felt intuitive or “right”? Perhaps there was some sort of imbalance rooted to the structure of the environment, and regardless of when a map takes form it’s important to recognize what recreated a certain situation, successful or not, and what that might mean later if reestablished in a new map. Are new ones required to innovate a design, and if so how long might that take to construct and resolve via technical skills? Levels take a lot of time to develop. Good-levels take a lot of time to let others actually try them out.

I was asked the other week whether my thesis project was more relevant to technical skills or the user experience, to which I replied, “The user experience.” Ultimately, this is what is relevant to the player – yet it only comes as readily as our knowledge of the tools to create a space for that  relevance. Surely I’ve learned over four years what it means to appreciate the craft of something, especially in digital media. Things either work or don’t work, and suddenly the only willingness that tends to matter is the kind that seeks and applies information. When a level is being constructed, behaviors within that environment begin to exist as well. These behaviors are another kind of information, another source of data to be mindful of as iterations surface. Ultimately, I’ve made Arc Mountain for others to play and if no one ends up wanting to play it then I’d like to know why. The least an author can do is sit some people down, peers most likely, establish a LAN (Local Area Network) or a remote server with the map available, and recognize what they appreciate and/or what they could do without.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s